Alaska Attorney Lawyer

On 22 February 2002, the General Accounting Office (GAO) the investigative arm of Congress, included in a previous appeal U.S. District Court in Washington on access to records of Vice President Richard B. Cheney ’s-Task Force on Energy Policy. The event, the name of Walker v. Cheney, imperious nature of the legal and constitutional questions under the authority of the GAO Comptroller General’s, and the expansion of Congress to ask the Vice President to provide information about the president of decision-making at National Energy Policy. Each page has based its reasoning on the concepts of constitutional basis based on competing theories about the proper balance of powers between the legislative and executive branches, and insisted on the other side was looking to achieve a revolution principles of separation of powers. But behind the facade of such a constitutional principle has been one of political arguments power struggle between the two camps, each trying to use them as a means of strengthening their own institutional prerogatives, to the detriment of others.

David M. Walker was perhaps well positioned for political struggle with the Vice President. As provided by law, Walker’s 1998 as Comptroller General selection was carried out in accordance with ten of State and Government of the House of Representatives and the Senate introduced his name, with a list of other candidates, the President shall for its consideration. In this list of candidates, the president was instructed to choose a Nominated - in this case, Walker - was the appointment, with Senate approval. The executive review of actions and appointment of fifteen years, the longest period of anywhere within the executive, who has been Comptroller General width and independence of the wage policy, a campaign advertising against a Vice President, refused to provide information on the formulation of the management of the national energy policy.

From February to May 2001, Vice President Cheney has led to a power task force, convening a series of meetings with no fewer than 400 people, in particular from the energy sector for a new energy policy for the nation. At the request of ranking House Democrats, the GAO has requested information above those of the Task Force. The Vice President denied the information, cited Executive confidentiality. There was little doubt that the records show that the administration was essentially the energy of economic leaders, had a hand in designing the administration of energy policy. But the records seemed beside the point. The Bush administration seized at the request of GAO comported with the Agency, many studies of the executive, to a much greater - the restoration and executive powers, the confidentiality of the investigation, to undermine Since the Nixon Administration. The case is an apparent indication of the Bush administration most to the agenda in contact, creating a strong executive office, centered push back the government and decades of legislative interference in the powers of the Chair. Meanwhile, the GAO has been eager to establish a legal precedent to clarify and expand his own powers of investigation and surveillance of the executive.